Skip navigation.

Whedon’s falter

Television | Thu, 02/26/2009 - 12:55 am | Read 971 | Commented 5 | Emailed 0

By Matt Lynch

Joss Whedon is one of those guys, like Cameron Crowe or Aaron Sorkin, who have these rabid fan bases and inordinate reputations — it’s almost taken on faith that a new project of one of theirs is going to be good. They all create stories full of glib characters who are so cool that you wish they’d come from your life, who always say the exact right thing you wish you could have said.

Eventually, though, these guys falter. Sorkin had Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, Crow had Elizabethtown, and now Joss Whedon has Dollhouse. When these failures happen, fans do a lot of equivocating about what elements failed to work or what excuses can be made to justify any mediocrity. Really, though, they’re just proof that the tricks these guys employ have always been pretty thin and annoying.

Whedon’s new show, Dollhouse (FOX) is no exception. Like his other work, namely Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Firefly, it’s a sort of Sci-Fi action hybrid. In this case, it’s about a mysterious organization that uses agents who have had their memories erased so that they can then be implanted with all the skills or memories necessary to carry out secret missions like hostage negotiation or looking really hot in a miniskirt.

Our main character, Echo (Eliza Dushku) would appear to be the star attraction (probably because she looks the hottest in the aforementioned miniskirt), and we follow her as she takes on one assignment after another while trying to suss out just what this shady organization is really up to and maybe find out who she really is. Meanwhile there’s an FBI Agent (Tahmoh Penikett from Battlestar Galactica) who is basically trying to do the same thing.

I think.

Problem is, none of this makes any sense at all. The Dollhouse is not (at least as far as we know) a government operation, since the characters constantly talk about going to jail if they’re exposed. Furthermore, we know that their services cost millions of dollars per case, so it is only within the reach of the extremely rich.

It seems to me that if you have a whole bunch of money, you would just hire a real hostage negotiator or some such other mercenary to do any dirty work you might find necessary. If it’s criminal activity, I see no reason to involve an even more secret criminal group to assist you, since the Dollhouse’s methods are absolutely going to be more expensive and difficult to retain than even a highly rated hit man, kidnapper, or what have you.

Then there’s the issue of the memory wipes. Why is Echo trying to figure out her true identity if, as we’re repeatedly told, the agents volunteer for this kind of work? And how do you get a job like this? Are there want ads? Perhaps this is more fully explained in later episodes, but I was simply too bored to wait around for the answers.

And that’s just what’s wrong with the idea.

Dushku is a very pretty lady, but she is simply not actress enough to play multiple characters across multiple episodes. And how come every single “expert” she plays has to be an insanely hot babe in tight clothes? Aside from the obvious ratings boost.

And all the clever dialogue and hot chicks with machine guns in the world can’t cover the fact that the individual cases are just derivative and boring. It’s like any number of episodes of V.I.P. or Charlie’s Angels or Knight Rider or whatever.

Same crap, different network. I’m just sick and tired of these quasi-serialized shows that contain these large overarching mysteries but feel the need to drag out the main stories and character arcs in between episode after episode of one-off cases and shows that don’t advance the main plot. Current and increasingly frustrating examples include Life, Burn Notice and Lie to Me, all much more interesting shows than this one that unfortunately have begun boring me to tears because they’re basically all the same exact show.

Meanwhile, people continue to watch Heroes, which it pains me to say is actually BETTER than Dollhouse. Yeowch.

Matt Lynch is The Voice’s TV critic.

Login or register to post comments

Comments (5)

We welcome your thoughts, stories and information related to this article.

Wed, 08/12/2009 - 4:37pm - Posted by: Matt Kadish

When I first started watching Dollhouse, not even my faith in Whedon was enough to give me hope for this show. I was a big fan of Buffy and Firefly, and all the horror stories surrounding the production of this show did little to instill a lot of faith in me.

However, as the season went on, it got GOOD. Real good. A lot of questions about the Dollhouse were answered, and its revealed to be a much bigger thing than previously thought. A lot of your criticisms are actually addressed towards the end of the season.

I think if Dollhouse can get at least 3 good seasons on the air, we'll see some of its true potential.

Thu, 02/26/2009 - 1:12pm - Posted by: hilarie

I'm pretty dissatisfied with the show so far, and with the premise and the way it is being worked out. For instance, wouldn't it be better, and a richer plot opportunity, if the Dollhouse's super rich clients didn't know they were hiring dolls but thought they were hiring a super-elite negotiator, gunslinger, motorcycle racer, whatever? In episode 1, the show uses the client's knowledge for plot: When he breaks protocol and obliquely refers to Echo's doll status it induces a psychic break, like a flashback. And that incident is what fuels Echo's emerging sense of continuity.

Which is the problem, apart from the threadbare snark, with this review: You really should pay at least a little attention to the show you plan to trash. Otherwise you come off like a guy on his way to get a beer who glances at the TV and says, "That show looks dumb."

Yep. Could turn out to suck. It's got problems. But it also could gel and turn out OK or even really good.

This review, however, will always just suck.

Thu, 02/26/2009 - 7:21am - Posted by: Anonymous

There is a scene in the pilot that explains that Caroline (Echo) was in trouble, and that the Dollhouse was her only way out of said trouble. That's why she is there.

And it could be argued that if you hire someone to commit a crime for you, the person you hired, even the best, still remembers that you hired them. What better assassin is there than one that doesn't remember they are an assassin, after the job is done?

Every expert she plays? She has played one expert in the series, a hostage negotiator. Eliza can't help the fact that she is insanely hot, and the outfit she wore as the hostage negotiator was quite demure. Sexy, but not tight or slutty, as your comment implies.

So what's the point? You didn't pay attention, and you don't seem to care. Why did you write this review? I'm a Joss fan, and I accept legitimate criticism of his work (And it ain't all great) but this review was a pointless waste of time.

Thu, 02/26/2009 - 5:25am - Posted by: Anonymous

Wow, the worst review i've ever read. Its obvious you didn't like Whedon before you watched the show and were delighted to read a few complaints about certain aspects of the show on the web so you could bundle them all together this pathetic attack on Whedon and his fans. Eliza is not that bad and the eps were enteraining. I would agree with you that the first two ep plots were derative but Whedon made Buffy where some of the most origional ideas on TV were produced. When final reviews of this season are written they will read, "started off shaky but became brilliant". True story.

Thu, 02/26/2009 - 4:25am - Posted by: entwashian

The snide, venomous tone of this review does more to discredit it's author than the show it derides.

And perhaps the author should wait until more than two episodes have aired before unilaterally declaring it to be a "failure".